Doua despre munca
miercuri, ianuarie 22nd, 20141. Success at Work, Failure at Home
One of the stated values at IronPort was “work/life balance,” but I clearly wasn’t living it. I was rarely home. And when I was home, well, let’s just say I wasn’t particularly helpful or cheery. My perspective at the time was: I’m killing myself at work, so when I get home, I just want to kick back with a cocktail and watch some TV. All I do is talk to people all day long and so at home, I’d really prefer not to talk much, just relax.
If the benefits of working fewer hours are this clear, why has it been so hard for businesses to embrace the idea? Simple economics certainly plays a role: in some cases, such as law firms that bill by the hour, the system can reward you for working longer, not smarter. And even if a person pulling all-nighters is less productive than a well-rested substitute would be, it’s still cheaper to pay one person to work a hundred hours a week than two people to work fifty hours apiece. (In the case of medicine, residents work long hours not just because it’s good training but also because they’re a cheap source of labor.) On top of this, the productivity of most knowledge workers is much harder to quantify than that of, say, an assembly-line worker.
This entry was posted on miercuri, ianuarie 22nd, 2014 at 09:03 and is filed under Discutii. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Era o vorba pe vremuri, pare-mi-se ca Exarhu a scos-o: decat un bou obosit mai bine un bou odihnit :-)
Sau „decat bou, mai bine odihnit”
Bune. ?i înc? una de la mine: Dealing With Workaholism On Web Teams. :)
Mai e ?i problema lui „do what you love”:
Bune ambele, multumesc.