Blocarea reclamelor, faza pe ISP
vineri, octombrie 2nd, 2015„(Digicel is) deploying ad control technology at the network level on its networks across the globe to ensure a better experience for customers and to encourage the likes of Google, Facebook and Yahoo to help connect the 4.2 billion unconnected people across the globe. Ad control technology benefits both consumers and network operators alike. With ads using up as much as 10% of a customers’ data plan allowance, this move will allow customers to browse the mobile web and apps without interruption from unwanted advertising messages.”
What sweethearts. Of course, the notice then proceeds to make it clear what this is really about. And that’s Digicel and billionaire owner Denis O’Brien’s belief that they are owed a cut of content company ad revenue simply because content company traffic touches their network:
„Companies like Google, Yahoo and Facebook talk a great game and take a lot of credit when it comes to pushing the idea of broadband for all – but they put no money in. Instead they unashamedly trade off the efforts and investments of network operators like Digicel to make money for themselves. That’s unacceptable, and we as a network operator, are taking a stand against them to force them to put their hands in their pockets and play a real role in improving the opportunities for economic empowerment for the global population.””
De aici
This entry was posted on vineri, octombrie 2nd, 2015 at 05:18 and is filed under Internet, Media. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Intelegem acum de ce Google vrea sa fie internet service provider…
in alta ordine de idei vorbeam zilele trecute cu un partener care are deal cu cei de la eyoo(adblock plus) pentru a nu li se bloca reclamele adsense…iar baietii iau bani si de la Goolge pt. acelasi lucru deci daca astia pot de ce nu ar putea si providerii de internet.
Asta cu adblock la care platesti ca sa te „albeasca” mi se pare geniala :)
Si ca sa-ti raspund, nu, ISP-urile nu ar putea face pentru ca este cenzura, spre deosebire de adblocker unde eu, ca user, am initiativa de a instala adblockerul si bloca reclamele.
@Orlando o pot baga ca extraoptiune gata selectata in interfata de administrare a contului de abonat, deci nu e cenzura..Dar modelul asta de „taxa de protectie” nu are cum functiona mult timp.
E altceva daca o baga ca si extra optiune, e similar cu ce a facut Apple cu aplicatiile adblock. Oarecum.
Eu nu eram pentru practica – ba dimpotriva – incercam doar sa gasesc justificarea unui ISP…
Un exercitiu similar si la fel de absurd ar fi pe TV – cum ar fi daca distribuitorul ar cere bani de la televiziuni ca sa le difuzeze reclamele. Pai si asta se intimpla deja cu posturile care nu sint „must carry”, banii aia tot din publicitate se platesc, deci un fel de precedent exista(doar ca pe TV nu prea exista posibilitatea sa se filtreze continutul de publicitate…momentan)
Dar hai sa ne imaginam in cat timp da faliment un ISP a caror clienti nu pot accesa gratuit sau deloc google, facebook, youtube s.a.m.d. Eu ii inteleg ca au platit miliarde pe licente, dar ei au alimentat coruptia si preturile prohibitive tocmai pentru a-i scoate din joc pe cei mici. Ia sa liberalizeze infrastructura sa vezi cum cad pe capete cu tot cu ifosele lor. Exemplul cel mai bun e chiar romania, fara retelele de cartier n-ar fi ajuns niciodata la stadiul actual. Cat de nenorociti or fi google & co, baietii din telecomunicatii sunt de 10 ori mai nenorociti si nocivi pentru business.